HOME  |   STATS  |   PUBLICATIONS  |   REGISTER  CONTACT US  SEARCH  


 Departments        
Advertising & PR News
Marketing News
TV & Cable News
Radio News
Magazine News
Newspaper News
Internet News

Retailing News
Consumer Research

Expenditure Data
People in the News
Industry News
Company Bios and
  Background


 Register Here       
STAY IN-THE-KNOW!
Are you getting the latest industry news when it happens via e-mail
?



Click here for free delivery of the Target Market News Bulletin
You'll receive news of breaking stories, exclusives, updates and headlines on the latest developments in African American marketing and media

 Black Stats          
Frequently requested data on African American consumers

Black Buying Power:
  $679 Billion (2004)

Black U.S. Population:
  38.3 million

Top Five Black Cities
  - New York
  - Chicago
  - Detroit
  - Philadelphia
  - Houston

Top Five Black Metros:
  - New York-New Jersey
  - Washington-Baltimore
  - Chicago-Gary
  - Los Angeles
  - Philadelphia

Top Five Expenditures:
 - Housing 110.2 bil.
 - Food 53.8 bil.
 - Cars/Trucks 28.7 bil.
 - Clothing 22.0 bil.
 - Health Care 17.9 bil.

Click here for more stats from "The Buying Power of Black America."
______________________
Get quick access to key
U.S. Census 
Bureau Data

Click here to go to African-American Census Bureau data

_____________________


Copyright
© 2006 by
Target Market News Inc.

All rights reserved
Business address:
228 S. Wabash Ave.
Suite 210
Chicago, IL 60604
t. 312-408-1881
f. 312-408-1867
info@targetmarketnews.com
 

 

Chicago Niketown employees allege racial discrimination in lawsuit

By Ameet Sachdev
Chicago Tribune
(March 24, 2006) A race discrimination lawsuit brought by 18 current and former African-American employees of the Niketown store on Michigan Avenue has been granted class-action status, creating a potentially damaging public relations problem for the shoe giant.

In an order unveiled Thursday, a federal judge in Chicago expanded the base of plaintiffs in the case to include more than 230 African-Americans who have worked at the store since Dec. 17, 1999, which is four years before the case was originally filed.

At issue is whether Niketown systematically discriminated against these workers in hiring, promotions, benefits and workplace discipline, thus subjecting them to a hostile environment.

The suit, filed in 2003, also makes embarrassing allegations that African-American customers, including professional athletes such as the Bulls' Tyson Chandler and three Green Bay Packer football players, were subject to greater scrutiny and monitoring at the Chicago store, which is one of 15 Niketown stores owned by the Beaverton, Ore.-based company.

While the judge did not address the merits of the employees' claims, the longer the case continues and the more publicity it receives could cause distress at Nike Inc., marketing experts said. Its shoes and clothing have a huge following among African-American youth. It also relies on high-profile black athletes, such as Michael Jordan and Kobe Bryant, in its marketing campaigns.

"Minority groups tend to pay more attention to this type of issue than others," said Christie Nordhielm, a clinical associate professor of marketing at the University of Michigan Ross School of Business. "The fact that the Chicago Niketown is a flagship store, it will cause a bigger fuss than most."

Nike appears concerned about potential fallout. Company spokesman Vada Manager said, "We want to communicate to our customers that we don't believe the allegations made in the case are consistent with our culture of inclusion and respect. We don't believe this reflects our corporate philosophy.

Nike, like most companies, has corporate policies addressing discrimination and harassment. But, as Nike corporate representatives said in depositions in this case, the enforcement of such guidelines is left to managers at the store level.

In Chicago, that resulted in African-American employees being singled out for poor treatment, plaintiffs said.

The allegations include:

- Segregating African-Americans into lower-paying stockroom and cashier positions.

- Denying opportunities for promotions to sales positions by failing to post job openings.

- Hiring African-Americans into part-time rather than full-time positions that received benefits, such as health insurance and paid vacation.

- Subjecting African-American employees to searches when leaving the store, while Caucasian employees were free from such searches. Work rules regarding attendance, sick leave and employee discounts also were unequally applied, the suit said.

"The allegations are overwhelming," said Ines Monte, one of the attorneys representing the employees. "They stop you in your tracks to think that this kind of stuff is happening there."

In granting class status, U.S. District Judge Milton Shadur rejected Nike's arguments that the allegations of poor treatment were isolated and random. The Nike spokesman declined to comment on whether the company would seek to appeal the class certification.

Still, there are number of allegations in dispute. The plaintiffs claim that between January 2001 and May 2003, fewer than 25 percent of the commissioned sales specialists, the highest-paid employees, were African-American.

Nike counters that its employment data from 1999 to 2004 show that more than 63 percent of the sales positions were filled by African-Americans, Manager said.

Two former employees who tried to represent themselves filed the complaint. The class is seeking an unspecified amount of damages, including lost wages and benefits.

A status hearing in the case is planned for next week.


Go to Target Market News homepage


 



Click here to read more

________________________



_____________________________________________________________________________________


 12th Annual Edition Available 

Latest 'Buying Power' report shows black consumers spending more on home life

As the American economy continues to move sluggishly, African-American households are curtailing their spending in many categories, including food, clothing and basic household items, while investing more in home repair, home entertainment and consumer electronics. Although they are trimming back, black consumers are still spending more than their white counterparts on most of these products.
Story and statistics continued

_________________________

  SUBSCRIBE TODAY! 


The trade publication for
in-depth coverage of Black
Consumer Marketing
and Media news